Chocolate Milk is a Healthy and Nutritious
Choice for Children and Youth
Chocolate milk is naturally nutrient-rich and contains the
same 16 essential nutrients as white milk. 
- Both white and chocolate milk include key bone-building nutrients
such as calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, protein, vitamin A and vitamin
D.
- Childhood and adolescence are key bone-building years where these
nutrients are crucial, as 90 per cent of bone mass is built by 20
years of age.1
Chocolate milk can help children and youth consume the recommended
servings of milk and alternatives from Canada’s Food Guide every
day.
- Many children and youth are missing out on the essential nutrients
found in milk.
- Data from the 2004 Canadian Community Health Survey showed that
more than one third of children aged four to nine did not meet Canada’s
Food Guide minimum recommended two daily servings of milk products.2
- By the time children reached ages 10-16, 61% of boys and 83% of
girls did not meet Canada’s Food Guide’s minimum recommended three
daily servings of milk products.2
- Chocolate milk may be an option to help children and adolescents
meet their minimum recommended servings of milk and alternatives
and consume adequate amounts of essential nutrients like calcium.
Chocolate milk is not a major source of added sugar in children’s
diets.
- Not all of the sugar in chocolate milk comes from added sugar.
One cup of milk (250 ml) contains 12 grams of lactose, a naturally
occurring sugar. The remainder of the sugar in milk is considered
added sugar. Check the label as not all brands have the same amount
of added sugar.
- The conclusions from the 2009 scientific statement from the American
Heart Association were that “when sugars are added to otherwise
nutrient-rich foods, such as sugar-sweetened dairy products like
flavoured milk and yogurts and sugar sweetened cereal, the quality
of children’s and adolescents’ diet improves, and in the case of
flavoured milks, no adverse effects on weight status were found.
However, deleterious health effects may occur when sugars are consumed
in large amounts.”3
- A recent article in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association
contained the following quote: “The data say that soda is the number
one contributor of [added] sugar in children’s diets, yet flavoured
milks, which are often the nutritional scapegoat, don’t even make
the list of the top five sources.”4
Table 1: Contribution of various foods to total added sugar
intake among U.S. children and adolescents. Adapted from the National
Cancer Institute.5
| Rank |
Food Source of
Added Sugar |
Contribution to Total
Added Sugar Intake |
| 1 |
Soda/energy/sports drinks |
32% |
| 2 |
Fruit drinks |
15% |
| 3 |
Grain-based desserts |
11% |
| 4 |
Dairy desserts |
8% |
| 5 |
Candy |
7% |
| 6 |
Ready-to-eat cereals |
6% |
Children who drink chocolate milk have higher total milk
intake, better overall diet quality and are not heavier compared
to non-milk drinkers.
- In a study by Johnson et al., the beverage choices of 3,888 children
ages 5 to 17 from the 1994-1996 and 1998 U.S. Department of Agriculture
Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) were assessed
using 24 hour dietary recalls.6
- Children who consumed flavoured milk had higher total milk intake
and lower soft drink and fruit drink consumption than children
who did not drink flavoured milk; however their intake of fruit
juice was similar.6
- Flavoured milk intake was positively associated with energy-adjusted
calcium and phosphorus intakes.6
- No association between flavoured milk intake and percent energy
for total fat and added sugars were found.6
- A study by Murphy et al. used 1999 to 2002 NHANES data to compare
the nutrient intakes and body mass index (BMI) of 7,557 children
and adolescents using 24 hour recalls.7 Subjects were classified
as flavoured milk drinkers (those who drink both plain and flavoured
milk), exclusively plain milk drinkers or milk non-drinkers.7
- Flavoured milk drinkers had significantly higher total milk
intakes compared to exclusively plain milk drinkers.7
- Intakes of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium and vitamin
A were significantly higher among flavoured milk and plain milk
drinkers compared to milk non-drinkers when adjusted for energy
intake and age.7
- Added sugar intakes were similar between flavoured milk drinkers
and milk non-drinkers.7
- BMI measures of flavoured milk and plain milk drinkers were
comparable to or lower than BMI measures of milk non-drinkers.7
For thought-provoking reading on the value of chocolate milk, check
out the following blog post by Dayle Hayes, MD, RD: The
Flavored Milk Wars: Is a Tempest in a Milk Carton Good For Kids Nutrition?
Click here for a pdf of this article.
References
1. Stransky M, Rysava L. Nutrition as prevention
and treatment of osteoporosis. Physiol Res [Internet]. 2009 [cited
2011 Dec 12];58(Suppl.1):S7-S11. Available from: http://www.hakimanteb.com/s4/article/calcium.pdf
2. Garriguet D. Nutrition: findings from the Canadian Community Health
Survey: overview of Canadians’ eating habits. 2004 [cited 2011 Dec
12]. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/Statcan/82-620-M/82-620-MIE2006002.pdf
3. Johnson RK, Appel LJ, Brands M, Howard BV, Lefevre M, Lustig RH,
et al. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific
statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet].
2009 [cited 2011 Dec 12];120:1011-1020. Available from: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/120/11/1011.full.pdf+html
4. American Dietetic Association. The state of family nutrition and
physical activity: are we making progress? 2011 [cited 2011 Dec
12]. Available from: http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0002-8223/PIIS0002822311003440.pdf
5. National
Cancer Institute. Risk factor monitoring and methods: table 4a. mean
intake of added sugar & percentage contribution
(kcal) of various foods among US children & adolescents, by
race/ethnicity & family income, NHANES 2005-06. 2010 [cited
2011 Dec 12]. Available from: http://riskfactor.cancer.gov/diet/foodsources/added_sugars/table4a.html
6. Johnson RK, Frary C, Wang MQ. The nutritional consequences of
flavored-milk consumption by school-aged children and adolescents
in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(6):853-856.
7. Murphy MM,
Douglass JS, Johnson RK, Spence LA. Drinking flavored or plain milk is positively
associated with nutrient intake and is not associated with adverse effects
on weight status in US children and adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(4):631-639. |